Photo 30 Jun 191 notes The 8 Best Lines From Ginsburg’s Dissent on the Hobby Lobby Contraception Decision
June 30 2014
On Monday, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg penned a blistering dissent to the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling that the government can’t require certain employers to provide insurance coverage for methods of birth control and emergency contraception that conflict with their religious beliefs. Ginsburg wrote that her five male colleagues, “in a decision of startling breadth,” would allow corporations to opt out of almost any law that they find “incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs.”
Here are seven more key quotes from Ginsburg’s dissent in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby:
"The exemption sought by Hobby Lobby and Conestoga would…deny legions of women who do not hold their employers’ beliefs access to contraceptive coverage"
"Religious organizations exist to foster the interests of persons subscribing to the same religious faith. Not so of for-profit corporations. Workers who sustain the operations of those corporations commonly are not drawn from one religious community."
"Any decision to use contraceptives made by a woman covered under Hobby Lobby’s or Conestoga’s plan will not be propelled by the Government, it will be the woman’s autonomous choice, informed by the physician she consults."
"It bears note in this regard that the cost of an IUD is nearly equivalent to a month’s full-time pay for workers earning the minimum wage."
"Would the exemption…extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah’s Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]…Not much help there for the lower courts bound by today’s decision."
"Approving some religious claims while deeming others unworthy of accommodation could be ‘perceived as favoring one religion over another,’ the very ‘risk the [Constitution’s] Establishment Clause was designed to preclude."
"The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield."
You can read the full dissent here. (It starts on page 60.)

The 8 Best Lines From Ginsburg’s Dissent on the Hobby Lobby Contraception Decision

June 30 2014

On Monday, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg penned a blistering dissent to the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling that the government can’t require certain employers to provide insurance coverage for methods of birth control and emergency contraception that conflict with their religious beliefs. Ginsburg wrote that her five male colleagues, “in a decision of startling breadth,” would allow corporations to opt out of almost any law that they find “incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs.”

Here are seven more key quotes from Ginsburg’s dissent in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby:

  • "The exemption sought by Hobby Lobby and Conestoga would…deny legions of women who do not hold their employers’ beliefs access to contraceptive coverage"
  • "Religious organizations exist to foster the interests of persons subscribing to the same religious faith. Not so of for-profit corporations. Workers who sustain the operations of those corporations commonly are not drawn from one religious community."
  • "Any decision to use contraceptives made by a woman covered under Hobby Lobby’s or Conestoga’s plan will not be propelled by the Government, it will be the woman’s autonomous choice, informed by the physician she consults."
  • "It bears note in this regard that the cost of an IUD is nearly equivalent to a month’s full-time pay for workers earning the minimum wage."
  • "Would the exemption…extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah’s Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]…Not much help there for the lower courts bound by today’s decision."
  • "Approving some religious claims while deeming others unworthy of accommodation could be ‘perceived as favoring one religion over another,’ the very ‘risk the [Constitution’s] Establishment Clause was designed to preclude."
  • "The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield."

You can read the full dissent here. (It starts on page 60.)

  1. alwaysbeyondhope reblogged this from hueva-york
  2. soulsentwined reblogged this from nightlysunflower
  3. idolisme reblogged this from daniellemertina
  4. luna-arsenica reblogged this from tweenfever
  5. captaindoubled reblogged this from nightlysunflower
  6. nightlysunflower reblogged this from daniellemertina
  7. kayebirdswims reblogged this from justatinysootsprite
  8. captainquint reblogged this from wolvensnothere
  9. ninjaruski reblogged this from wolvensnothere
  10. eggspunnysideup reblogged this from wolvensnothere
  11. wolvensnothere reblogged this from slash-addict
  12. slash-addict reblogged this from msprufrock
  13. msprufrock reblogged this from bibliophilebetty
  14. tweenfever reblogged this from phantomdoodler
  15. xgp15aii reblogged this from daniellemertina and added:
    Goin IN!
  16. bookslesparks reblogged this from phantomdoodler
  17. gracekitty reblogged this from thebrigeedarocks
  18. thebrigeedarocks reblogged this from bibliophilebetty
  19. kimicita reblogged this from bakethatlinguist

Design crafted by Prashanth Kamalakanthan. Powered by Tumblr.